Research archive / 01

Selected research.

I study how text becomes representation, how unwanted signals enter that representation, and how an intervention changes the decisions built on top.

Semantic modeling · Representation analysis · LLM reliability
R—01
Minor revision

First author · IPM · 2026

Prospect trade-off comparison framework: Mining online reviews for consumer decision support

Feiyang Ying1, Honggang Peng2,*, Jianqiang Wang3, Xiaokang Wang4

Online reviews rarely express one clean preference. This work extracts aspect–opinion–sentiment structures with a QLoRA-adapted Qwen model, maps sentiment into a continuous space, and models compensatory consumer trade-offs for decision support.

  • 16,014 reviews
  • 9 electric vehicles
  • 3 platforms
  • QLoRA
  • Qwen-14B
R—02
Under review

First author · AEI · 2026

Mining cross-platform online reviews for consumer decision support: A representation-debiased SAGE-TODIM framework

Feiyang Ying1, Bo Deng1, Jiahui Liu2, Xianghui Lyu2, Honggang Peng2,*, Jianqiang Wang3, Xiaokang Wang4

Platform bias is often handled after text has already been compressed into scalar scores. This work probes representation-level platform signals, removes their linear directions with LEACE, and aligns cross-platform semantics before ranking.

  • 48,027 reviews
  • 10 products
  • 3 platforms
  • DeBERTa-v3
  • LEACE
  • SAGE-TODIM
R—03
Ongoing

National undergraduate innovation project

Data-driven decision support from cross-platform online reviews

I lead a project connecting the two research lines above: extracting decision-relevant meaning from real reviews, then making representations more comparable across platforms.

  • Project lead
  • 2025—2026
  • NLP × decision science

Current research interests

Directions I am actively developing.

These topics extend my existing work in semantic modeling, representation intervention, and open-source LLM tooling.

Q—01

Representation analysis

Probe representations for platform, sentiment, and task signals; then measure what remains after a controlled intervention.

Q—02

Model editing & evaluation

Evaluate knowledge edits for efficacy, locality, robustness, and consistency across devices and model implementations.

Q—03

Reliable agent systems

Test whether exchanged information improves receiver-conditioned reasoning under matched budgets and explicit controls.

Public links

Manuscript links will appear when public versions are ready.

Status labels describe the current process; they do not imply acceptance. Code and preprints will be linked only when they are ready for public use.

GitHub